| |
Sarcoidosis
This page is for those with a medical interest in my sarcoidosis.
Medical
History
| Dr's
Notes, Lab notes, and all clinical findings related to my
sarcoidosis |
Organ |
|
This is how it all went down. It started with an appointment
for a physical exam...
I had requested a physical exam from my primary care. The
process also involved a pap and some lab work. In addition,
I requested an x-ray because of my history of smoking and
not knowing if I had caused any damage. Mostly curiosity.
Labs:
6/8/2001
Abnormal test findings are in bold with the
numbers in red:
| CBC: |
| WBC |
5.5 |
4.5-10.8
x10^3/uL |
| RBC |
4.86 |
4.20-5.40
x10^6/uL |
| HGB |
15.0 |
12.0-16.0
g/dL |
| HCT |
43.9 |
36.0-47.0
% |
| MCV |
90.3 |
80.0-99.9
fL |
| MCH |
30.8 |
27.0-31.0
pg |
| MCHC |
34.1 |
33.0-37.0
g/dL |
| RDW |
13.0 |
11.5-14.5
% |
| PLT |
212. |
150.-450.
x10^3/uL |
| MPV |
9.0 |
7.4-10.4
fL |
| LY% |
15.8
L |
20.5-51.1
% |
| MO% |
5.9 |
1.7-9.3
% |
| GR% |
78.3
H |
42.2-75.2 |
| LY# |
0.9 |
0.7-4.9
x10^3/uL |
| MO# |
0.3 |
0.1-0.9
x10^3/uL |
| GR# |
4.3 |
1.5-7.2
x10^3/uL |
| URINALYSIS: |
| COLOR |
YELL |
| APPEARANCE |
SLT.
HAZY |
| SPECIFIC
GRAVITY |
1.5 |
| PH |
6 |
| GLUCOSE |
NEG |
| BILIRUBIN |
NEG |
| KEYTONE |
NEG |
| OCCULT
BLOOD |
NEG |
| PROTEING |
NEG |
| UROBILINOGEN |
NORM |
| NITRITE |
NEG |
| LEUKOCYTES |
NEG |
| |
|
| MICROSCOPIC/HPF |
| RBC |
RARE |
| PUS |
1-4 |
| BACT. |
OCC. |
| EPITH
CELLS |
OCC. |
| MUCOUS
THREADS |
SM. |
| |
|
|
BLOOD |
| 6/15/01
Primary
care office note:
"xx"
comes in today to review results of her recents labs. She
continues to smoke and is having some dyspnea on exertion.
The eczema on her posterior neck has cleared.
Physical
examination:
Lungs: Clear without wheezing. Skin: She has some facial
redness/rash consistent with acne rosacea. Area of eczema
on neck appears to be healing.
Impression:
1. Smoker 2. Reactive airways
Plan:
The patient was given three samples of Zyban and the toll
free numer for further information on the patch. I will
see her back for follow-up in three weeks. She will finish
her antibiotic in the meantime. A chest x-ray was
obtained today which was normal. This was reviewed
with the patient and she was reassured.
xx,
MD |
CHEST |
| 6/18/01
Phone
message to Dr. [in my chart]
For:
Dr. xx
Dr. xx [radiologist]
Re:; patient xx.
ABNORMAL CXR!
MEDIASTINUM LOOKS ABNORMAL
MAY BE MEDIASTINAL LYMPHADENOPATHY.
RECOMMENDS CT-SCAN. |
LYMPH
NODES |
| 6/15/01
Radiology
notes on X-RAY:
CLINICAL
INFORMATION:
Dyspnea, smoker.
FINDINGS:
The pulmonary interstitium is prominent. The lung volumes
are large. These findings likely reflect smoking. Heart
size is normal.
Fullness
of left aortopulmonary window is present, raising question
of lymphadenopathy. In addition, the right paratrecheal
stripe is thickened above the level of the azygous vein.
IMPRESSION:
Possible mediastinal lymphadenopathy. This could be furhter
evaluated with CT scan of the chest with intravenous contrast.
xx,
MD |
LYMPH
NODES |
| 6/22/01
Radiology
notes on NEW x-Rays taken for CT scan comparison
Examination:
Chest (2 views)
Clinical
Information: An outside chest radiograph is reportedly abnormal
Findings:
Two views of the chest were performed as per my instructions
for planning the scheduled chest CT and for correlation
with that study.
The cardiac volume is normal. The mediastinum and hila are
abnormal with mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy present.
The lungs appear clear.
Impression:
Mediastinal and bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy.
xxMD
[hello!
huge red flag screaming sarcoidosis, so why didn't they
tell me at that point. I was scared to death of cancer]. |
LYMPH
NODES |
| 6/22/01
CT scan:
Clinical
information: Abnormal chest radiograph with mediastinal
and hilar lymphadenopathy
Findings:
The examination is performed with intravenous contrast and
comparison is made with the concurrent chest radiograph.
There are numerous enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes.
Image # 16
shows a 2.8 cm x 2.0 cm pretracheal lymph node.
Image #19 shows
a 7.0 cm x 2.0 cm confluent left para-aortic lymph node.
There is subcarinal lymphadenopathy. Bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy
is present larger on the right.
Image #23 shows
a 3.0 cm x 2.2 cm right hilar lymph node.
The lung parencyma appears normal. There is no pulmonary
nodule. There is no pleural effusion.
The
study includes images of the upper abdomen. The liver is
normal. The bile ducts and pancreas appear normal. There
are several mildly enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes.
There are enlarged lymph nodes in the hilum of the spleen.
The spleen is normal in size but has numerous small low-attenuation
regions best seen on the narrow windows. See
spleen.
Impression:
Mediastinal and bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy consistent
with either lymphoma or sarcoidosis. The presence of retroperitoneal
lymphadenopathy and abnormal spleen suggest that lymphoma
is more likely.
xx,MD |
LYMPH
NODES
SPLEEN |
| 6/26/01
Oncologist
visit
[Notes
edited for length, redundancy and privacy].
...The
patient is scheduled to leave tonight on an airplane which
takes her on a vacation. She will not be back for about
10 days. We have offered her a tissue biopsy but she would
like to wait. She already has an appointment with Dr. xx
for surgical consideration.......
Examination:
...I performed a lymph node palpation of her neck, supraclavicular,
inguinal and exillary areas and found absolutely no evidence
of palpable lymphadenopathy.....everything else he lists
is just normal.
Assessment
and plan:
1. Diffuse adenopathy in the chest. I did show her the scans
and she noted the lymphadenopathy as I did. I think we can
do nothing until tissue is obtained. Unfortunately, I was
unable to find any peripheral adenopathy that could be biopsied
more easily than a mediastinosocopy. Since she is seeing
Dr. xx soon, I believe that he will suggest a mediastinoscopy,
which I would agree with. Obviously if this is lymphoma,
she will need a full workup including CT scan of the chest,
abdomen and neck, plus a bone marrow aspirate and biopsy
bilaterally. If this is sarcoidosis then she will be treated
with other drugs, probably Prednisone.
1. Allergies to Penicillin and Keflex
3. Skin infections. It is remotely possible that this is
all secondary to infection, however tissue diagnosis is
still required. She might merit an infectious disease consult
with xx as to why she keeps getting these infections.
xx,
MD |
LYMPH
NODES |
| 7/19/01
Mediastinoscopy
notes from Surgeon:
ANESTHESIA:
General
ANESTHESIOLOGIST: xx, MD
PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Mediastinal Adenopathy
POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Mediastinal Adenopathy
PROCEDURE: Cervical Mediastinoscopy
FINDINGS:
Enlarged lymph nodes in the pretracheal and the right paratracheal
region consistent with probably lymphoma
INDICATIONS:
The patient is a 37-year-old female who underwent a routine
physical examination. During the examination, she had a
chest x-ray performed and was found to have probably mediastinal
adenopathy. A CT scan was obtained which confirmed the presence
of mediastinal adenopathy. Concerns were for lymphoma and
, therefore, plans were made for mediastinoscopy for tissue
diagnosis. She did not have any other enlarged lymph node
stations that were more easily accessible.
DETAILS
OF PROCEDURE: The patient received Levaquin as she is allergic
to Keflex. She is brought to the operating room and placed
in supine position. Appropriate monitoring lines and pneumatic
compression devices were placed. She underwent a general
anesthetic. She was placed with her neck hyperextended.
Her
neck was prepped and draped in sterile fashion. A transverse
incision was made just abo e the sternal notch. The incision
was carried through to the platysma and between the strap
muscles, onto the trachea. A plane was established in the
pretracheal space down into the mediastinum. A mediastinoscope
was inserted and dissection with the mediastinoscope revealed
enlarged petracheal and right paratracheal lymph nodes consistent
with what was seen on the CT scan. These lymph nodes were
dissected and samples were taken for both pathology as well
as for cultures.
Hemostasis
was achieved. The incision was then closed using 3-0 Vicryl
to reapproximate the strap muscles and the platysma in separate
layers. Then, skin was closed with 4-0 Vicryl subcuticular
stitches. Dressing were applied. There were no apparent
complications.
xx,
MD |
LYMPH
NODES |
| 7/20/01
Pathology
report:
Tissue
Source: Right lower paratracheal lymph nodes
FINAL
DIAGNOSIS: Right lower paratracheal lymph nodes: Lymph node
parenchyma identified which shows extensive non-caseating
granulomatosis with calcification. Consistent with sarcoidosis.
|
LYMPH
NODES |
| 7/25/01
Follow-up
surgery visit at primary care.
He does
a big sweep of "negative" under the Reivew of
Symptoms table, including skin, where the choices are rash
lump itchy and dry.
At this visit I told him I was concerned about a firm lump
underneath my skin on my arm. He said "oh its just
fat". He didn't note it.
All he noted was my chronic skin lesion issue:
"Pt is in today for followup of mediastinoscopy which
showed a sarcoid. This may explain the skin lesions she
has been suffering with. She has been using Triacinolone
cream which seems to be helpful. She is still smoking but
has cut down.
Review
of systems: Negative for ENT, cardiopulmonary. She has no
pruritic chest pain, no other problems."
[what?!] |
SKIN |
| 10/11/01
Pulmonologist
[Notes
edited for length, redundancy and privacy].
CHEST
X-RAY demonstrates marked right peri-tracheal and peri-hilar
fullness, consistent with hilar adenopathy.
IMPRESSION:
Stage 1 pulmonary sarcoidosis. The only
question I have with respect to specific organ system involvement
relates to the patient's skin. I have asked that she be
evaluated by a dermatologist in this regard. The is no current
indication for corticosteroids treatment.....
Dr.
Note to my primary care:
Dear
Dr. xx
Thank
you very much for sending Ms. xx to my clinic for evaluation
of pulmonary sarcoidosis. Given the current clinical manifestations,
she would be defined as having Stage 1 disease, which confers
on her an 80% chance of spontaneous remission. I performed
office spirometry and ECG today, which failed to demonstrate
any significant abnormality. She will need an eye evaluation
and her CBC, serum calcium, and liver function tests should
be obtained at a baseline.
<snip> |
LYMPH
NODES
LUNGS |
| 5/6/02
[10 months after my 1st complaint...]
Bumps
in right arm - x 1 year.
"xx" was seen today for evaluation of a bump on
her right arm. She has a history of sarcoidosis. This raises
the question of whether the bumps are related to her sarcoidosis.
She requested a biopsy today.
PROCEDURE:
After informed consent was obtained, the skin was anesthetized
with 1% Xylocaine. A 5 mm punch biopsy was obtained and
the specimen sent to pathology. The wound was closed with
twho interrupted 5.0 nolon sutures.
PLAN:
Return in ten days for suture removal
xx,
MD |
SKIN |
| 5/7/02
Pathology
report:
SPECIMEN:
Right arm biopsy
CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS/DATA/HISTORY: Possible sarcoid
DIAGNOSIS:
Skin identified, consistent with arm region, which shows
numerous non-caseating granulomas in dermis. Consistent
with sarcoidosis. No cellular atypia.
xx,
MD |
SKIN |
| 5/16/02
Primary
care note:
38 year
old female presents with a rash on the right arm that was
biopsied and turned out to be a sarcoid. She only has cutaneous
and pulmonary but no ocular. She has been followed by a
pulmonologist and opthalmologist but nothing is active so
no specific treatment is required. She will educate herself
about sarcoid and will get back to me if she has any active
symptoms.
xx,
MD
[Again,
what? Nothing is active? and what rash??? I had a hard nodule
underneath my skin, not a rash! My nodules were actively
multiplying and getting bigger and darker and harder. I
have not seen this Dr. since this visit].
*
Note I quit smoking 3 days after this exam. Have not smoked
since. |
SKIN |
| 8/28/2002
Follow-up
Chest X-Ray.
Findings:
The adenopathy has incrased in size mildly to moderately
since March. The lungs appear normal with no significant
interstitial nodular disease identified. No pleural effusion.
View
x-ray
Right
before this x-ray I was laid off, and ran out of insurance
shortly after. No more sarc checks for a while. |
LYMPH
NODES
LUNGS |
No
sarcoid checks for 3 1/2 years
Sept
2002 - Sept 2004: No insurance
Sept 2004 - May 2005: Blue Cross, but no sarc checks
June 2005 - June 2006: United Healthcare
Although insured through temp agency, it was not comprehensive,
so sarc checks postponed 'til conversion to fulltime employment.
But fate got in the way.... |
|
|
3/20/2006
Eyes!
Bood-shot eyes, extreme light sensitivity, blurry vision
and pain. Lasted only a couple of days.
Ophthalmologist notes:
Pt states very painful light sensitive os, started last
night. Some tearing os.
Diagnosis: Iridocyclitis - primary
Assessment: Iritis os -- pt has sarcoid
Plans: Use meds rx'd, rto 2-3 days....sooner if worsens
[meds were optical steroid drops (predforte) for the inflamation,
and dilation drops (cyclopentolate) to relax the iris and
to halt dilation. Reason: the iris inflamation made the
dilation changes horrendous]
[These labs are a little hard to extract but I'll do my
best here:]
Anterior Segment Exam / OS
Conjunctiva > Bulbar > 3+ redness 360 degrees
Epithelium > wnl, small round opacity
Depth/Cells/Flare > /trace /trace
Optic Disc > size/ ratio > 0.2 / 0.2
Retina > vitreous > clear
Exam method > 20 diopter, drops > MYD 1%
*
Note I asked the Dr. directly if my iritis was due to sarcoidosis
and she said yes.
----- from uveitis.org ----
"Iridocyclitis is a term used to denote inflammation
in two parts ofthe uveal tract of the eye; the iris and
the ciliary body. It derives its name from combining iritis
(inflammation of the iris) and cyclitis (inflammation of
the ciliary body)."
|
EYES |
| January
2007:
With
stronger insurance that came with permanent employment,
got on with an internal medicine Dr. who took over management
of my sarc., so time for f/u chest x-ray
Radiology
notes:
Findings:
2 views of the chest again demonstrate enlargement of the
mediastinum consistent with lymphadenopathy. This involves
the AP window and the right paratracheal region prominently.
There is that slightly plump appearance of the hila is less
prominent than before but similar.
There
is no infiltrate nor parenchymal lung abnormality identified.
No pleural effusion. Bony thorax is unremarkable. Heart
size is normal.
Impression:
Mediastinal adenopathy and probably hilar adenopathy, typical
findings of sarcoidosis, and without definite change compared
to previous exam [5 years ago]. No new abnormality.
Or as
the Pulmonologist simplly put it: Lymphadenopathy still
present. No decrease or increase.
|
LYMPH
NODES
LUNGS
HEART |
|
2007
Note
from myself:
Issues
with inflamation still continue. I suspect sarcoid playing
a part in the unrelenting inflamation of my nasal membranes
and turbinates. On a scale from 1-10 the effectiveness of
Flonase is about 5.
A (rare
for me) cold virus got out of hand with pulmonary inflamation,
producing short-term athsma and bronchitis. Sarc may have
contributed to the inflammation. Remember, people don't
usually die from sarcoidosis -- it however can make existing
conditions (such as pneumonia) worse.
I have
just a small concern regarding lungs. A little more wheezy
than used to be and shortness of breath occurs sooner. Sometimes
I get really weird dry coughing attacks that make me gasp.
Honestly, I assume its because I'm nasally congested 24/7/365.
This stuff here is not a problem, just something I've noticed.
|
SINUSES
LUNGS |
| 2008
This
was during a time of unemployment and no insurance. Working
on curbing stress, and being positive.
A
Learning Experience:
I had
an idea to make the most out of a situation that I hate
and have no control over. I got the notion in my head that
the dermatology students at the nearby teaching university
might enjoy seeing some cutaneous sarcoids so I contacted
the school. Turns out they were just getting ready to have
an annual event where about 100 students come in and look
at some selected cases of unusual diseases and they invited
me to be one of the cases.
I went
in and had my own room (very nice room with a view of the
ship canal and I-5 bridge). I didn't do the gown since they
would be able to see my arms from my tank top I wore. Groups
of about 8 students plus an attending or resident came in
for about 10 minute sessions, separated by the ringing of
a bell. This went on for 4 hours. They did feed us and give
us gas money. The students came in and I invited them to
touch my arms and really get a feel for the depth and shape
of my nodules. One student in each group would get to do
a differential diagnosis. Most were very good. I didn't
like the students who just stayed in the corner and stared,
and the ones didn't touch or touched so light it was like
a feather. I told them it wouldn't hurt me, but some were
too wimpy. The ones that got in there and felt the depth
got a nice surprise and they smiled with fascination and
thanked me.
Last but not least I also had the opportunity, when I remembered,
to give the quick 411 on sarc and to suggest to the students
that if they find sarc in a patient who doesn't have a previous
diagnosis, to recommend they get a chest x-ray and evaluation
from their doctor because they might have things going on
that they didn't know about, and that sarc might explain
lots of stuff going on that has been a mystery until the
biopsy confirmed sarc.
These
are the terms used to describe my cutaneous sarcoidosis
during examinations:
- Plaques
(or plaque-like lesions)
- Violacious
- Non-scaly
- Indurated
- Some were annular, with central clearing (soft in clear
area)
- Almost
no blanching
- Apple jelly (yea, I thought that was weird too)
- Infiltrated
in the dermis
- The
plaque on my nose is called lupus pernio, just because
its on my face
- My lip has a sarcoid lesion
See
my skin
Other
things I didn't know.
- Diascopy,
using a thin glass slide pressed down on a lesion, reveals
currant, or apple jelly appearance
- Sarcoidosis plaques can be mistaken for tuberculosis
plaques.
- Erethematous means red, and violacious means purple.
The brownish red and purplish color is indicative of sarcoidosis.
- All but one of the Drs. called my sarcoids plaques,
but also called them nodules. One Dr. said that they were
nodules not plaques because of their depth. Picky picky.
- Erethema nodosum, a sarcoidosis related condition, is
inflammation of the fatty tissue and usually happens on
the legs. I don't have it but was told that if I get it
to have it looked at right away.
- The dermis is thick, and if you have sub-cutaneous it
is in the fatty layer underneath the dermis. That's why
its uncommon. Mine appears to be mostly infiltrated into
the dermis.
- Injected (not topical) corticosteroids may reduce or
eliminate lesions.
- One attending said that some gulf war veterans seem
to be getting sarcoidosis.
So
there you have it. My skin sarcs. I helped science and turned
something that is negative into something positive. I also
learned quite a bit about cutaneous sarcoidosis and my particular
involvement. A very educational day. Incidentally, one of
the administrative assistants who was there helping with
the event told me that she happens to have pulmonary sarcoidosis
that is in remission. It was so cool to finally meet another
sarkie in person! |
SKIN |
|
11/20/08
Uninsured. Went to a free clinic for a check up. Asked
about getting blood work to check my thyroid and cholesterol,
since they've both been slightly out of range for several
years. My last 2 physical exams (both different doctors),
didn't include CBC. But this P.A. had put it in the lab
orders. And I'm glad he did, because it had some interesting
findings!
Abnormal test findings are in bold with
the numbers in red:
| TEST |
RESULT |
REFERENCE
RANGE |
| CBC: |
| WBC |
1.6 |
4.3-11.0
10e9/L |
| RBCx10e12 |
5.16 |
3.79-5.25
/L |
| HEMOGLOBIN |
14.5 |
11.5-16.0
GM/DL |
| HEMATOCRIT |
43.8 |
34.5-47.0
VOL% |
| MCV |
84.9 |
80.0-100.6
FL |
| MCH |
28.1 |
25.0-33.4
PG |
| MCHC |
33.1 |
25.0-33.4
PG |
| RDW-CV |
14.4 |
32.3-36.5
GM/DL |
| PLATELET
COUNT |
146 |
150-480
10e9/L |
| MEAN
PLT VOLUME |
10.6 |
9.3-12.9
FL |
| NEUTROPHIL |
footnote |
% |
| LYMPHOCYTE |
footnote |
% |
| MONOCYTE |
footnote |
% |
| EOSINOPHIL |
footnote |
% |
| BASOPHIL |
footnote |
% |
| NEUTROPHIL
ABS |
0.29
|
1.80-7.80
10e9/L |
| LYMPHOCYTE
ABS |
0.50
|
1.00-4.00
10e9/L |
| MONOCYTE
ABS |
0.12 |
0.20-0.80
10e9/L |
| EOSINOHIL
ABS |
0.51 |
0.00-0.45
10e9/L |
| BASOPHIL
ABS |
0.02 |
0.00-0.20
10e9/L |
| RDW-SD |
44.5 |
38.4-53.1 |
| MANUAL
DIFFERENTIAL: |
| POLY |
5 |
21-85
% |
| BAND |
13 |
0-12
% |
| LYMPHOCYTE |
32 |
12-60
% |
| MONOCYTE |
8 |
0-17
% |
| EOSINOPHILS |
33 |
0-8
% |
| BASOPHILS |
1 |
0-2
% |
| ATYPICAL
LYMPHS |
8 |
0-5
% |
| VACUOLATED
POLY |
PRESENT |
|
| LARGE
PLTS |
PRESENT |
|
| METABOLIC
/ chem 14: |
| GLUCOSE |
97 |
70-100
MG/DL |
| BUN |
11 |
5-19
MG/DL |
| CREATININE |
1.04 |
0.50-1.00
MG/DL |
| SODIUM |
138 |
135-145
MMOL/L |
| POTASSIUM |
4.4 |
3.5-5.5
MMOL/L |
| CHLORIDE |
104 |
96-108
MMO/L |
| BICARBONATE |
23 |
18-30
MMOL/L |
| ANION
GAP |
11 |
5-16
MM/L |
| CALCIUM |
9.7 |
8.5-10.5
MG/DL |
| PROTEIN
TOTAL |
8.1 |
6.7-8.2
GM/DL |
| ALBUMIN |
4.3 |
3.9-4.9
GM/DL |
| BILIRUBIN
TOTAL |
0.9 |
0.1-1.0
MG/DL |
| ALK
PHOS |
77 |
28-114
U/L |
| AST
(SGOT) |
20 |
0-40
U/L |
| ALT
(SGPT) |
13 |
0-40
U/L |
| LIPID
GROUP: |
| CHOLESTEROL |
198 |
100-200
MG/DL |
| TRIGLYCERIDE |
166 |
30-150
MG/DL |
| HDL
CHOLESTEROL |
35 |
40-125
MG/DL |
| LDL
CHOLESTEROL |
130 |
0-130
MG/DL |
| CHOL/HDL
RATIO |
5.66 |
0.00-4.44
RATIO |
 |
|
|
| TSH |
5.512 |
0.300-5.000
uIU/ML |
| FREE
T4 |
1.18 |
0.80-1.80
NG/DL |
Cholesterol Discussed diet/excersise
Thyroid 12/4/08 started Synthroid 25 mcg. Finally!
TSH and CBC re-check in a few weeks.
WBC Very scary, since no insurance. I wondered if
this was due to sarc in my spleen. I talked to my former
PCP who said that given my history of sarc, it could be
my bone barrow. Don't worry about spleen unless bone marrow
biopsy comes out ok. Suggested a 2nd lab, then to get on
medicaid, and to get with a hematologist for a bone marrow
biopsy. May not qualify for medicaid because of unemployment
checks. Will try to not get sick
|
BLOOD |
01/19/09
| TEST |
RESULT |
REFERENCE
RANGE |
| GENERAL
HEALTH PANEL: |
| WBC |
1.4 |
4.3-11.0
10e9/L |
| RBCx10e12 |
5.36 |
3.79-5.25
/L |
| HEMOGLOBIN |
14.5 |
11.5-16.0
GM/DL |
| HEMATOCRIT |
44.5 |
34.5-47.0
VOL% |
| MCV |
83.0 |
80.0-100.6
FL |
| MCH |
27.1 |
25.0-33.4
PG |
| MCHC |
32.6 |
32.3-36.5
GM/DL |
| RDW-CV |
14.2 |
11.0-16.0
% |
| RDW-SD |
42.4 |
38.4-53.1 |
| PLATELET
COUNT |
130 |
150-480
10e9/L |
| MEAN
PLT VOLUME |
10.3 |
9.3-12.9
FL |
| DIFFERENTIAL:
|
| NEUTROPHIL |
28.3 |
% |
| LYMPHOCYTE |
23.2 |
% |
| MONOCYTE |
29.0 |
% |
| EOSINOPHIL |
18.8 |
% |
| BASOPHIL |
0.7 |
% |
| NEUTROPHIL |
0.39 |
1.8-7.8
10e9/L |
| LYMPHOCYTE |
0.32 |
1.00-4.00
10e9/L |
| MONOCYTE |
0.40 |
0.20-0.80
10e9/L |
| EOSINOPHIL |
0.26 |
0.00-0.45
10e9/L |
| BASOPHIL |
0.01 |
0.00-0.20
10e9/L |
| LIPID
GROUP: |
| TSH |
0.738 |
0.300-5.000
uIU/ML |
| FREE
T4 |
1.74 |
0.80-1.80
NG/DL |
Thyroid much improved!
White Blood Count still freaky low, but since I'm not sick
or have any chronic infections and feel great then no worries.
Besides I couldn't afford a bone marrow check if I was
sick. |
BLOOD |
| 5/2/09
Abnormal
test findings are in bold with the numbers
in red:
| TEST |
RESULT |
REFERENCE
RANGE |
| GENERAL
HEALTH PANEL: |
| GLUCOSE |
92 |
65-100
MG/DL |
| BUN |
11 |
8-25
MG/DL |
| CREATININE |
0.9 |
0.6-1.3
MG/DL |
| CALCULATED
BUN/CREAT |
12 |
6-28 |
| SODIUM |
138 |
133-146
MEQ/L |
| POTASSIUM |
3.8 |
3.5-5.3
MEQ/L |
| CHLORIDE |
103 |
97-110
MEQ/L |
| CARBON
DIOXIDE |
23 |
18-30
MEQ/L |
| CALCIUM |
9.4 |
8.5-10.5
MG/DL |
| PROTEIN,
TOTAL |
8.0 |
6.0-8.4
G/DL |
| ALBUMIN |
4.3 |
2.9-5.0
G/DL |
| CALCULATED
GLOBULIN |
3.7 |
2.0-3.8
G/DL |
| CACULATED
A/G RATIO |
1.2 |
0.9-2.5 |
| BILIRUBIN,
TOTAL |
0.8 |
0.1-1.3
MG/DL |
| ALKALINE
PHOSPHATASE |
92 |
30-132
U/L |
| SGOT
(AST) |
16 |
5-35
U/L |
| SGPT
(ALT) |
7 |
7-56
U/L |
| CBC: |
| WBC |
1.5 |
4.0-11.0
K/UL |
| RBC |
4.96 |
3.80-5.10
M/UL |
| HEMOGLOBIN |
13.1 |
11.5-15.5
G/DL |
| HEMATOCRIT |
39.2 |
34.0-45.0
% |
| MCV |
79.1 |
80.0-100
fL |
| MCH |
26.4 |
27.0-34.0
PG |
| MCHC |
33.4 |
32.0-36.4
G/DL |
| RDW |
15.5 |
11.0-15.0
% |
| NEUTROPHILS |
30 |
40-74
% |
SEGMENTED
NEUTROPHILS, MANUAL DIFF. |
| LYMPHOCYTES |
37 |
19-48
% |
| MONOCYTES |
17 |
3-11
% |
| EOSINOHILS |
14 |
0-7
% |
| BASOPHILS
|
2 |
0-2
% |
| PLATELET
COUNT |
174 |
130-400
K/UL |
RBC'S
ARE NORMOCHROMIC/NORMOCYTIC
PLATELET
COUNT CONFIRMED BY REVIEW OF THE PERIPHERAL SMEAR.
NO MORPHOLOGIC ABNORMALITY OF PLATELETS IDENTIFIED. |
| LIPID
GROUP: |
| TSH |
<
0.1 |
0.3-5.1
K/UL |
Dr.
said he will refer me to a hematologist for my blood and
to a rheumatologist for my sarcoid.
He didn't
mention the TSH and I had just filled a prescription from
him for a year's worth of Levothyroxin 150 mcg. I should
probably get an adjusted dosage. |
BLOOD |
Rheumatologist
He did
an exam where he noticed splenomegaly. Referred me to a
pulmonologist and new primary care. Records pending. |
SPLEEN |
|
5/20/09
Opthalmologist:
Attempted transcription of "impression" section
of notes. (see hard copies)
1. Sarcoidosis without ophthalmic involvement
2. Allergies - 2nd syle
3. Sinus - at'er
Doc said no sarcoid was visible.
|
EYES |
|
5/19/09
Hematologist notes: Initial consult
Billing/coding diagnosis: Leukocytopenia, unspecified -
288.50
Diagnosis: xx is a 45-year-old lady with significant neutropenia
History of present illness:
xx has a pretty involved medical history. She has a longstanding
diagnosis of sarcoidosis. She has had manifestations in
her lung, skin and eye. xx has also suffered from hypothyroidism
and hypercholesterolemia. However, xx has floated between
jobs and insurances and has not been able to undergo any
treatment for her problems. Recently xx moved to Tulsa and
then to Oklahoma City a few months later. In Tulsa she was
able to have some blood work done in the clinic. That demonstrated
a significantly low white count but no further investigation
could be undertaken at that time. However, xx was able to
start on some thyroid repletion. After moving to this area,
xx once again had some blood work which confirmed a low
white count of 1.5 with only 30% neutrophils. xx is now
referred over for additional investigation. She notes that
she was also able to visit with her rheumatologist last
week. It was felt that her spleen was a little bit enlarged
at that time. However, so far no treatments have been initiated.
xx has no real additional complaints today. She does note
that some recent infections have taken a long time to heal
but she has not really had any severe illnesses. She does
not have any fevers, sweats or chills either.
Past Medical History: As noted in HPI. Surgical procedures
include mediastinoscopy in 2001 when the diagnosis was made.
Apparently a skin biopsy has also confirmed the diagnosis.
Medications: Levothyroxine 150 mcg.
Allergies: Penicillin and Cephalosporin
Family History: Noncontributory
Social History: The patient is single. She has had a variety
of jobs over the years and has had exposure to hair dye
and acrylic. She does have history of smoking. No significant
alcohol.
Review of Systems: General: Energy level and appetite are
pretty steady. No fevers, sweats, or weight loss. HEENT:
Sinus congestion. Co acute complaints. Respiratory: Wheezing
with exertion. No resting shortness of breath or productive
cough. No severe respiratory infections. Cardiovascular:
Without excertional chest pains or palpitations. Gastrointestinal:
Without nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, pain, or bleeding. Genitourinary:
Without hematuria or dysuria. Musculoskeletal: New new bone
pain. Neurologic: No focal problems or severe headaches.
Dermatologic: Active rash from sarcoidosis.
Physical Examination: xx is in acute distress. Vital Signs:
BP 129/81, pulse 88, temp 97.1, weight 202 lbs. she is 5
feet 5 inches tall. HEENT: Normocephalic, atraumatic. Negative
pallor. Negative thrush. No mouth sores. Neck: Neck supple
without venous distention. Lymph Nodes: Negative throughout.
Lungs: Clear to auscultation and percussion bilaterally
to the bases. Hearth: Regular S1, S2. No murmurs, rubs,
or gallops. Abdomen: Positive bowel sounds. Spleen tip is
just palpable but without masses, hepatosplenomegaly. Extremeties:
Without clubbing, cyanosis, or edema. Neurologic: Alert
and appropriate. Grossly nonfocal. Skin: Some scattered
faintly erythematous plaque.
Labs: Recently white count was 1.5 with only 30% segs,
hemoglobin normal at 13.1, and platelets normal at 174.
Creatinine and LFT's well within normal limits. TSH was
suppressed at less than 0.1.
Impression: xx is a 45-year-old lady with long standing
history of biopsy proven sarcoidosis. For several months
she has had neutropenia and she is now able to pursue additional
evaluation to see if this problem is related to her prior
diagnosis. We will pursue bone marrow examination to confirm
that and rule out the small possibility of an additional
disorder. At the same time we will also check B12 and folate
levels. Finally since it has been quite some time we will
repeat a CT of the abdomen for an additional look at the
spleen. Depending on the findings, xx might benefit from
a course of treatment for her systemic illness. In addition
we could pursue a brief course of white cell growth factor
in setting of any severe infections or planned procedures.
xx, M.D.
|
BLOOD |
|
5/22/09
Bone Marrow Aspiration:
Operative Notes:
PROCEDURE: Bone marrow aspirate and biopsy.
INDICATIONS: Leukopenia
The patient was placed prone. The area over the right posterior
superior iliac crest was prepped and draped in the usual
sterile fashion. Licocaine 1% was infiltrated. Jamshidi
was inserted. The patient experienced some additional pain
when the Jamshidi touched the periosteum. So, additional
Lidocaine was infilatred through the Jamshidi needle. Three
attempts at removing aspirate were performed. Unfortunately
no aspirate was obtained. However, there was a clot section
which will be sent for cell count and differential and morphology.
After the additional Lidocaine the patient tolerated the
procedure adequately.
xx, M.C.
Radiology Notes:
CT ABDOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT CONTRAST:
CLINICAL HISTORY: Sarcoidosis. Splenomegaly.
The spleen is enlarged measuring 17.3 cm in length. There
are multiple splenic, gastric, and esophageal varicosities
present. There also does appear to be varicosities in the
para-aortic region. It is difficult to distinguish some
of these from lymphadenopathy. There is only a small amount
of oral contrast in the duodenal sweep region. There is
a soft tissue density seen in the right upper abdomen which
measures 4.7 x 2.2 cm. This is seen close to the region
of the gallbladder. The liver is not enlarged. A few liver
cysts are seen.
No hydronephrosis is apparent.
IMPRESSION:
-
Splenomegaly.
- Multiple
varicosities in the para-aortic region, gastric and splenic
region. In the right upper abdomen there is a 4.7 cm density
which is difficult to determine whether this is soft tissue
mass, varicosities, adenopathy, or part of the duodenal
sweep. Recommend ultrasound of the abdomen with dedicated
attention to the region just deep to the gallbladder.
Also ultrasound of the abdomen could help determine that
the para-aortic densities are varicosities rather than
adenopathy.
-
There appears to be a prominent esophageal varicosity.
Labs:
Abnormal
test findings are in bold with the numbers
in red:
| TEST |
RESULT |
REFERENCE
RANGE |
| VITB12,
FOLIC ACID, RA |
| VITB12 |
369 |
193-982
pg/mL |
| FOLIC
ACID |
9.2 |
3.0-17.0
ng/mL |
| RA |
<20 |
<=
20 U/mL |
| ANA |
| ANA |
NEGATIVE |
NEGATIVE
ISR |
| CBC |
| WBC |
1.3 |
4.8-10.8
K/mm3 |
|
Repeated Result |
1.2 |
|
| RBC |
5.07 |
4.20-5.40
M/mm3 |
| HGB |
13.2 |
12.0-16.0
gm/dL |
| HCT |
39.4 |
37.0-47.0
% |
| MCV |
77.6 |
81.0-99.0
fL |
| MCH |
26.1 |
27.0-34.0
pg |
| MCHC |
33.6 |
31.0-37.0
g/dL |
| RDW |
14.6 |
11.5-14.5
% |
| PLATELET |
134 |
130-400
K/mm3 |
| GRAN
% (auto) |
26.1 |
48.0-70.0
% |
| LYMPH
% |
29.1 |
22.0-45.0
% |
| MONO
% |
25.1 |
4.5-10.0
% |
Monocytosis
noted
Repeated Result: |
21.6 |
|
| EOS |
19.4 |
0.6-6.0
% |
Eosinophilia
noted
Repeated Result: |
20.6 |
|
| BASO
% |
0.3 |
0-1.6
% |
| GRAN
# |
0.3 |
2.9-7.5
K/mm3 |
| LYMPH
# |
0.5 |
1.4-3.4
K/mm3 |
| MONO# |
0.3 |
0.4-0.8
K/mm3 |
| EOS
# |
0.2 |
0.0-0.5
K/mm3 |
| BASO
# |
0.0 |
0.0-0.5
K/mm3 |
COMMENT:
Abnormal Detected
Smear is available for WBC and/or RBC morphology review
or Manual Differential by a Technologist upon receipt
of order. |
| WINTERGREN
ESR |
| WINTERGREN
ESR |
13 |
0-20 |
|
BONE
Marrow
SPLEEN
BLOOD |
|
5/28/09
Hematologist Notes: Follow-up
Diagnosis: xx is a 45-year-old lady with history of sarcoidosis
and leukopenia.
Interval History: xx was able to undergo bone marrow examination,
however, the study was difficult and only a minute sample
was obtained. The material was actually pretty unremarkable
with normal maturation and relatively normal cell ratios.
The results showed no evidence of granulomatous disease,
however, more tissue would definitely be helpful. xx also
underwent CT scanning. That confirmed the splenomegaly which
was known but also showed extensive varicosities in the
splenic, gastric and esophageal blood vessels. There was
also a question of soft tissue density in the right upper
abdomen. Despite this xx continues to feel pretty well.
She is not experiencing abdominal pain and has good energy
with no enexplained fevers.
<leaving out symptoms and physical - was not examined>
Labs: Bone marrow and imaging as noted. ANA is negative
as is the rheumatoid factor. B12 and folate are within adequate
ranges.
Impression: xx is a 45-year-old lady with history of sarcoidosis
and now found to have profound leukopenia. Workup for that
shows no obvoius evidence of sarcoid as the etiology but
unexpectedly there is evidence of portal hypertension as
well as vague abnormality in the right upper quadrant. To
get to the bottom of this we will need to repeat the bone
marrow exam which will probably be best done by interventional
radiology at this point. In addition, if feasible, I would
like them to consider biopsy of the right upper quadrant
area if confirmed or possibly just the liver to try to assess
why there is significant portal hypertension.
|
LIVER
BONE Marrow
BLOOD |
|
06/09/09
Retuned to the hospital for 2nd bone marrow aspiration
as well as biopsy of the mystery "density".
Pathology notes (liver):
REQUISITION INFORMATION:
1) Liver biopsy 2) Liver biopsy 2. 3) Lymph node next to
liver
Pre: Liver - hepatitis versus periportal fibrosis. Lymph
node - sarcoidosis
History: Previous diagnosis of sarcoid and has had splenomegaly.
Also received is additional material for hematology.
DIAGNOSIS:
A. Liver - Needle Biopsy: Granulomatous inflammation
B. Liver - Needle Biopsy: Granulomatous inflammation; Steatosis,
focal
C. Lymph Node - Biopsy, Next to Liver: Granulomatous inflammation.
COMMENT: Sections of the liver needle biopsies show well-formed
noncaseating granulomas with expanded portal
tracts consistent with the clinical history of sarcoidosis.
The hepatic lobules show only focal mild steatosis. Iron
stain is performed on both parts A and B and no iron is
detected. Reticulin stain performed on both blocks shows
intact hepatic architecture. The trichrome stains show expansion
of the portal triads and possible early bridging fibrosis.
Pathology notes (bone marrow):
REQUISITION INFORMATION:
Bone biopsy, red; CBC; peripheral smears (2+2); reports;
bone marrow, EDTA, bone marrow, clot (red); bone marrow,
green; bone marrow slides (x5). Preop dx: Sarcoidosis, leukopenia
with neutropenia.
History: Splenomegaly. Also received is additional material
for surgical pathology.
DIAGNOSIS:
A. Peripheral Blood: leukopenia; thrombocytopenia
B. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy: Normocellular marrow
with adequate numbers of megakaryocytes. COMMENT:
Review of the peripheral smear, bone marrow biopsy and CBC
show peripheral cytopenias with a normocellular marrow containing
adequate numbers of megakaryocytes. The white cells do demonstrate
a left shift.
Labs:
Abnormal
test findings are in bold with the numbers
in red:
| TEST |
RESULT |
REFERENCE
RANGE |
| CBC
- drawn with bone marrow |
| WBC |
1.4 |
4.8-10.8
K/mm3 |
|
Repeated Result |
1.5 |
|
| RBC |
4.64 |
4.20-5.40
M/mm3 |
| HGB |
12.7 |
12.0-16.0
gm/dL |
| HCT |
37.3 |
37.0-47.0
% |
| MCV |
80.3 |
81.0-99.0
fL |
| MCH |
27.5 |
27.0-34.0
pg |
| MCHC |
34.2 |
31.0-37.0
g/dL |
| RDW |
14.3 |
11.5-14.5
% |
| PLATELET |
127 |
130-400
K/mm3 |
| GRAN
% (auto) |
39.3 |
48.0-70.0
% |
| LYMPH
% |
21.7 |
22.0-45.0
% |
| MONO
% |
24.3 |
4.5-10.0
% |
Monocytosis
noted
Repeated Result: |
23.5 |
|
| EOS |
14.4 |
0.6-6.0
% |
Eosinophilia
noted
Repeated Result: |
15.2 |
|
| BASO
% |
0.3 |
0-1.6
% |
| GRAN
# |
0.6 |
2.9-7.5
K/mm3 |
| LYMPH
# |
0.3 |
1.4-3.4
K/mm3 |
| MONO# |
0.3 |
0.4-0.8
K/mm3 |
| EOS
# |
0.2 |
0.0-0.5
K/mm3 |
| BASO
# |
0.0 |
0.0-0.5
K/mm3 |
COMMENT:
Abnormal Detected
Smear is available for WBC and/or RBC morphology review
or Manual Differential by a Technologist upon receipt
of order. |
|
LIVER
BONE Marrow
BLOOD |
|
06/19/09
Hematologist Notes:
Billing/Coding Diagnosis: Leukocytopenia, unspec. - 288.50
Diagnosis: xx is a 45-year-old lady with history of sarcoidosis
and recent diagnosis of neutropenia.
Interval History:
xx was able to go for additional bone marrow examination
which produced more material. She also had biopsies of a
lymph node in the right upper quadrant as well as liver
biopsy. Both the lymph node and the liver demonstrated granulomatous
inflammation. There was some incipient bridging fibrosis
in the liver but no extensive scarring. Interestingly, there
were no granulomas in the bone marrow and only a minimal
shift in the white cells. There is no evidence of any other
infiltrative process or disorder maturation. xx actually
has established care with a rheumatologist and will be following
up next week to discuss a treatment plan in light of the
most recent results.
<leaving out symptoms and physical - was not examined>
Impression:
xx is a 45-year-old lady with extensive sarcoidosis, now
demonstrated in lymph nodes and liver, though interestingly
not in the bone marrow. The leukopenia could be due to concentration
at the sites of inflammation as I would expect more of as
a pancytopenia if the etiology were hypersplenism, otherwise,
the blood work abnormalities are almost certainly related
to the extensive sarcoidosis. Therefore, xx was encouraged
to proceed with treatment with Dr. xx.
|
LIVER
BONE Marrow
BLOOD |
|
07/23/2009
Pulmonologist
Labs:
Abnormal test findings are in bold with the numbers
in red:
| TEST |
RESULT |
REFERENCE
RANGE |
| CBC
w/ DFF/PLT |
| WBC |
1.8 |
3.8-10.8
Thousand /uL |
| RBC |
5.09 |
3.80-5.10
Million/uL |
| HGB |
14.1 |
11.7-15.5
g/dL |
| HCT |
40.8 |
35.0-45.0
% |
| MCV |
80.1 |
80.0-100.0
fL |
| MCH |
27.6 |
27.0-33.0
pg |
| MCHC |
34.5 |
32.0-36.0
g/dL |
| RDW |
14.9 |
11.0-15.0
% |
| PLATELET |
clumped |
140-400
K/mm3 |
| NEUTROPHILS
ABS |
324 |
1500-7800
cells/uL |
| BAND
NEUTROPHILS ABS |
288 |
0-750
cells/uL |
| LYMPHOCYTES
|
468 |
850-3900
cells/uL |
| MONOCYTES ABS |
378 |
200-950 cells/uL |
| EOSINOPHILS ABS |
342 |
15-500 cell/uL |
| BASOPHILS ABS |
0 |
0-200 cells/uL |
| NEUTROPHILS |
18 |
%
|
| BAND NEUTROPHILS |
16 |
% |
| LYMPHOCYTES |
26 |
% |
| MONOCYTES |
21 |
% |
| EOSINOPHILS |
19 |
% |
| BASOPHILS |
0 |
% |
COMMENT:
Evaluate results with caution. The white blood cell
count and platelet count may be altered due to interferences
caused by the presence of significant numbers of platelet
clumps. |
| METABOLIC |
| GLUCOSE |
92 |
65-99 mg/dL |
| UREA NITROGEN (BUN) |
14 |
7-25 mg/dL |
| CREATININE |
0.94 |
1.59-1.07 mg/dL |
| eGFR AFRICAN AMERICAN |
>60 |
> or = 60 mL/min/1.73m2 |
| BUN/CREATININE RATIO |
n/a |
6-22
(calc)L |
| SODIUM |
138 |
135-146 mmol/L |
| POTASSIUM |
4.0 |
3.5-5.3 mmol/L |
| CHLORIDE |
103 |
98-110 mmol/L |
| CARBON DIOXIDE |
23 |
21-33 mmol/L |
| CALCIUM |
9.9 |
8.6-10.2 mg/dL |
| PROTEIN,TOTAL |
8.1 |
6.2-8.3 g/dL |
| ALBUMIN |
4.4 |
3.6-5.1 g/dL |
| GLOBULIN |
3.7 |
2.2-3.9 g/dL (calc) |
| ALBUMIN/GLOBULIN RATIO |
1.2 |
1.0-2.1 (calc) |
| BILIRUBIN, TOTAL |
0.8 |
0.2-1.2 mg/dL |
| ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE |
95 |
33-115 U/L |
| AST |
20 |
10-35 U/L |
| ALT |
12 |
6-40 U/L |
| SED RATE BY MODIFED |
| WESTERGREN, MANUAL |
35 |
< or = 20 mm/h |
| ANGIOTENSIN CONVERTING ENZYME (ACE) |
| ACE, SERUM |
150 |
9-67 |
| CALCIUM, 24 HOUR URINE |
| CALCIUM, 24 HOUR URINE |
574 |
<250
mg/24 h |
| HISTOPLASMA ANTIGEN URINE |
| HISTOPLASMA ANTIGEN URINE |
< 2.0 |
< 2.0 EIA Units |
| FUNGAL
PANEL 2, id AND cf |
| ASPERGILLUS FLAVUS AB |
negative |
negative |
| ASPERGILLUS NIGER AB |
negative |
negative |
| ASPERGILLUS FUMIGATUS AB |
negative |
negative |
| BLASTOMYCES ANTIBODY, ID |
negative |
negative |
| COCCIDIOIDES ANTIBODY, ID |
negative |
negative |
| YEAST PHAS ANTIBODY |
<1:8 |
<1:8 |
| MYCELIAL PHASE ANTIBODY |
<1:8 |
<1:8 |
Dr. started me on hydrochlorothiazide for the high urine calicium.
|
BLOOD
KIDNEYS
|
|
11/02/2009
Primary Care
Went to primary care to ask about my constant sweating.
She checked estrogen and FSH levels and said I wasn't menopausal.
She said that if the sweating was happening around the time
of my periods then it would likely be parimenopause related,
but since mine happens all the time she said it might be
sarcoidosis related. However, in her notes she wrote that
it could be perimenopausal.
| TEST |
RESULT |
REFERENCE
RANGE |
| ESTRADIOL |
61 pg/mL |
Follicular phase 11-212 Mid-cycle 18-480 Luetal phase < or= 247 post-menopausal < or = 27 |
| FSH |
9.9 mIU/mL |
Follicular phase 2.5-10.2 Mid-cycle peak 3.1-17-7 Luetal phase 1.5-9.1 post-menopausal 23.0-116.3 |
She also did a blood work up
| TEST |
RESULT |
REFERENCE
RANGE |
| CBC
w/ DFF/PLT |
| WBC |
1.9 |
3.8-10.8
Thousand /uL |
| RBC |
4.81 |
3.80-5.10
Million/uL |
| HGB |
13.9 |
11.7-15.5
g/dL |
| HCT |
41.4 |
35.0-45.0
% |
| MCV |
86.0 |
80.0-100.0
fL |
| MCH |
28.8 |
27.0-33.0
pg |
| MCHC |
33.5 |
32.0-36.0
g/dL |
| RDW |
15.5 |
11.0-15.0
% |
| PLATELET |
152 |
140-400
Thousand/uL |
| NEUTROPHILS
ABS |
657 |
1500-7800
cells/uL |
| LYMPHOCYTES ABS
|
494 |
850-3900
cells/uL |
| MONOCYTES ABS |
386 |
200-950 cells/uL |
| EOSINOPHILS ABS |
342 |
15-500 cell/uL |
| BASOPHILS ABS |
21 |
0-200 cells/uL |
| NEUTROPHILS |
34.6 |
%
|
| LYMPHOCYTES |
26.0 |
% |
| MONOCYTES |
20.3 |
% |
| EOSINOPHILS |
18.0 |
% |
| BASOPHILS |
1.1 |
% |
COMMENT:
Evaluate results with caution. The white blood cell
count and platelet count may be altered due to interferences
caused by the presence of significant numbers of platelet
clumps. |
| METABOLIC |
| GLUCOSE |
98 |
65-99 mg/dL |
| UREA NITROGEN (BUN) |
12 |
7-25 mg/dL |
| CREATININE |
1.02 |
1.59-1.07 mg/dL |
| eGFR
NON-AFRICAN AMERICAN |
59 |
> or = 60 mL/min/1.73m2 |
| eGFR
AFRICAN AMERICAN |
> 60 |
> or = 60 mL/min/1.73m2 |
| BUN/CREATININE RATIO |
n/a |
6-22
(calc)L |
| SODIUM |
140 |
135-146 mmol/L |
| POTASSIUM |
4.0 |
3.5-5.3 mmol/L |
| CHLORIDE |
105 |
98-110 mmol/L |
| CARBON DIOXIDE |
23 |
21-33 mmol/L |
| CALCIUM |
9.5 |
8.6-10.2 mg/dL |
| PROTEIN,TOTAL |
7.7 |
6.2-8.3 g/dL |
| ALBUMIN |
4.2 |
3.6-5.1 g/dL |
| GLOBULIN |
3.5 |
2.2-3.9 g/dL (calc) |
| ALBUMIN/GLOBULIN RATIO |
1.2 |
1.0-2.1 (calc) |
| BILIRUBIN, TOTAL |
0.8 |
0.2-1.2 mg/dL |
| ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE |
85 |
33-115 U/L |
| AST |
17 |
10-35 U/L |
| ALT |
12 |
6-40 U/L |
|
BLOOD |
|
02/04/2010
Primary
Care
Thyroid check: Levels are finally good. Now on 150 mcg 5x a week.
| TEST |
RESULT |
REFERENCE
RANGE |
| TSH,
3rd GENERATION |
1.28 |
>
or = 20 years: 0.40-4.5 |
|
BLOOD |
01/21/2010
Pulmonologist
Ran comprehensive blood work (compare to last July):
| TEST |
RESULT |
REFERENCE
RANGE |
| METABOLIC |
| GLUCOSE |
89 |
65-99
mg/dL |
| UREA
NITROGEN (BUN) |
12 |
7-25
mg/dL |
| CREATININE |
0.98 |
1.59-1.07
mg/dL |
| eGFR
NON-AFRICAN AMERICAN |
>60 |
>
or = 60 mL/min/1.73m2 |
| eGFR
AFRICAN AMERICAN |
>60 |
>
or = 60 mL/min/1.73m2 |
| BUN/CREATININE
RATIO |
n/a |
6-22
(calc)L |
| SODIUM |
138 |
135-146
mmol/L |
| POTASSIUM |
3.8 |
3.5-5.3
mmol/L |
| CHLORIDE |
102 |
98-110
mmol/L |
| CARBON
DIOXIDE |
25 |
21-33
mmol/L |
| CALCIUM |
9.7 |
8.6-10.2
mg/dL |
| PROTEIN,TOTAL |
7.9 |
6.2-8.3
g/dL |
| ALBUMIN |
4.4 |
3.6-5.1
g/dL |
| GLOBULIN |
3.5 |
2.2-3.9
g/dL (calc) |
| ALBUMIN/GLOBULIN
RATIO |
1.3 |
1.0-2.1
(calc) |
| BILIRUBIN,
TOTAL |
0.8 |
0.2-1.2
mg/dL |
| ALKALINE
PHOSPHATASE |
80 |
33-115
U/L |
| AST |
17 |
10-35
U/L |
| ALT |
8 |
6-40
U/L |
| SED
RATE BY MODIFED |
| WESTERGREN,
MANUAL |
27 |
<
or = 20 mm/h |
| ANGIOTENSIN
CONVERTING ENZYME (ACE) |
| ACE,
SERUM |
125 |
9-67 |
| CALCIUM,
24 HOUR URINE |
| CALCIUM,
24 HOUR URINE |
281 |
<250
mg/24 h |
|
BLOOD |
|
04/07/10
Emergency
Room
Went
to the ER because I was coughing up blood (hymoptysis).
ER Notes:
The
patient presents with cough and Patient with intermittent
cough over the past 2 days. Patient with slight amount of
bright red blood. Patient states that the blood it was not
mixed with sputum. Patient states that she felt "liquid"
coming up her throat and this caused her to cough to clear
it. Patient with a history of sarcoidosis. The onset was
1 days ago. The course/duration of symptoms is fluctuation
in intensity. Character productive: bloody. The degree at
onset was minimal. The degree at present is minimal. Exacerbating
factors consist of none. The relieving factor is beta agonist.
Risk factors consist of Sarcoidosis. Prior episodes: none.
Therapy today: none. Associated symptoms: denies shortness
of breath, denies chest pain, denies sore throat, denies
rhinorrhea, denies nasal congestion and denies hoarse voice.
Labs:
Abnormal test findings are in bold with the numbers
in red:
| TEST |
RESULT |
REFERENCE
RANGE |
| CBC
w/ DFF/PLT |
| WBC |
2.09 |
3.8-10.8
X 10^3 |
| RBC |
5.19 |
3.80-5.10
X 10^6 |
| HGB |
14.6 |
11.7-15.5
g/dL |
| HCT |
41.1 |
35.0-45.0
% |
| MCV |
79.2 |
80.0-100.0
fL |
| MCH |
28.1 |
27.0-33.0
pg |
| MCHC |
35.5 |
32.0-36.0
g/dL |
| RDW |
14.2 |
11.0-15.0
% |
| PLATELET |
149 |
150-450
X 10^3 |
| NEUTROPHILS
ABS |
.900 |
1.500-7.800
X 10^3 |
| LYMPHOCYTES
ABS |
.51 |
.85-4.10
X 10^3 |
| MONOCYTES
ABS |
0.40 |
0.20-0.95
X 10^3 |
| EOSINOPHILS
ABS |
.270 |
0.050-0.550
X 10^3 |
| BASOPHILS
ABS |
0.01 |
0.00-0.20
X 10^3 |
| NEUTROPHILS |
43.1 |
34-66
% |
| LYMPHOCYTES |
24.4 |
12-48
% |
| MONOCYTES |
19.1 |
1.0-13.0
% |
| EOSINOPHILS |
12.9 |
<
= 3 % |
| BASOPHILS |
0.5 |
<
= 2.0 % |
| METABOLIC |
| GLUCOSE |
93 |
65-99
mg/dL |
| BLOOD
UREA NITROGEN (BUN) |
13 |
7-25
mg/dL |
| CREATININE |
0.86 |
0.5-1.20
mg/dL |
| BUN/CREATININE
RATIO |
15.1 |
6.0-25.0
(calc) |
| SODIUM |
137 |
135-146
mmol/L |
| POTASSIUM,
SERUM |
3.9 |
3.5-5.3
mmol/L |
| CHLORIDE |
101 |
98-110
mmol/L |
| CARBON
DIOXIDE |
28 |
21-33
mmol/L |
| CALCIUM |
9.1 |
8.5-10.4
mg/dL |
| C1Cr
Calculated |
81.00 |
mL/min |
| Osmolality |
273.6 |
273.0-304.0
mOsmo |
| COAGULATION |
| D-Dimer
Quantitative |
2.4 |
0.0-2.5
mg/L FEU |
| Radiology |
|
X-ray:
Two views of the chest demostrate the lungs are clear.
Prominence of the mediastinum and axilla consistent
with lymphadenopathy. Heart size is normal. Visualized
osseous structures are grossly intact.
Impression:
1. Mediastinal and axillary lymphadenopathy
2. No acute cardiopulmonary disease
[See x-ray]
|
 |
|
CT Chest w/ Infusion PE:
There are no filling defects to the level of the segmental
pulmonary arteries. No consolidation, effusion or
pneumothorax. Extensive mediastinal, hilar and axillary
lymphadenopathy. Enlarged subcarinal nodes and nodes
adjacent to the esophagus. Calcified right hilar lymph
node. The largest nodes are in the prevascular region
and measure up to 4.0 x 2.5 cm. Thoracic aorta is
normal size.
Extensive retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Subcentimeter
cyst the left of the liver.
Impression:
1. Negative for PE
2. Extensive mediastinal lymphadenopathy which may
be seen with lymphoma or sarcoidosis given the clinical
history.
[See CTs: 1
| 2 | 3
| 4 ]
|
 |
Patient with evidence of bronchitis, exacerbation of "sarcoid
induced asthma" Patient with very non-toxic appearance
here aside from mild wheezing. Patient comfortable, no heavy
hemoptysis or recurrent cough here. Patient with x-ray showing
no obvious infiltrate. Case discussed with [pulmonologist]
with CT-PE discussed. Patient with initial D-dimer positive
so CT-PE ordered to rule out pul infarct, occult pneumonia.
If no PE or other abnormality dictating inpatient admission,
patient may be DC'd. Patient looks very good from clinical
standpoint. Patient will followup with xxx or his PA in
2 days, call for appt. Impression: Acute bronchitis, hx of sarcoid |
BLOOD
LUNGS
LYMPH NODES
LIVER |
[Go Back]
HOW
CAN I HELP?
There is NO CURE for sarcoidosis, and the cause is unknown.
Researchers must have funding to find answers.
"It's kind of like other major diseases, but without the
recognition, attention, sympathy, funding treatment, or cure."
(© theGardener)
You can do it! Try donating to something other than breast
cancer, MS, AIDS, and heart disease.
You'll feel just as great for helping with this one!
(and you'll be helping me as well)
|
|